Ethical Pluralism (a new Mathilde Ludendorff) and existentialism

    Table of Contents

Ethical Pluralism and Existentialism: Intersections of Multiplicity, Freedom, and the Search for Authentic FulfillmentIntroduction: Two Philosophies Grappling with Human Existence Amid UncertaintyIn the philosophical pursuit of understanding human existence, meaning, and moral responsibility, Ethical Pluralism and existentialism emerge as profound yet distinct traditions that challenge conventional views of reality and ethics. Existentialism, a 19th-20th century movement associated with thinkers like Søren Kierkegaard, Friedrich Nietzsche, Martin Heidegger, Jean-Paul Sartre, and Albert Camus, emphasizes the primacy of individual existence over abstract essence, the absurdity of life in a godless or indifferent universe, and the radical freedom of humans to create meaning through authentic choices. It rejects essentialism (the idea that humans have a predetermined nature) and universal moral systems, insisting that "existence precedes essence" (Sartre's famous dictum), where individuals must confront anguish (angst), alienation, and the void to forge their own values in a world without inherent purpose.Ethical Pluralism, a contemporary philosophical reconstruction, stands in dialogue with existentialism by affirming reality as a mosaic of irreducible plural essences—independent modes of being such as persistence (replicative continuity), finitude (programmed termination enabling renewal), transformation (contingent adaptation without purpose), consciousness (reflective awareness), aspiration (strivings toward ethical, aesthetic, epistemic, and relational values), transcendence (experiential elevation beyond time, space, and causality), moral discernment (intrinsic evaluation of actions), and relational fulfillment (discerning bonds of affinity and distinction)—coexisting without any common aspect, unifying principle, substrate, or teleological hierarchy. Drawing from quantum mechanics' probabilistic multiplicities (e.g., superpositions embodying coexistent states without resolution) and evolutionary biology's contingent branching (e.g., phylogenetic diversity without unified "progress"), Ethical Pluralism derives ethics not from subjective choice or absurdity but from the intrinsic affirmation of these essences via "God-Cognisance"—an experiential awareness that evokes awe at plurality's depth and fosters fulfillment amid diversity, free from dogma, external purpose, or imposed unity.This essay explores the relation between Ethical Pluralism and existentialism, structured through sections on metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and modern implications. It highlights convergences in their emphasis on freedom, authenticity, and the rejection of essentialist universals, while underscoring divergences in their treatment of multiplicity (absurd void vs. irreducible essences), meaning (self-created vs. experiential affirmation), and human condition (anguish in absurdity vs. awe in plurality). Through this comparison, we discern how Pluralism offers a scientifically attuned, optimistic complement to existentialism's often bleak individualism, potentially enriching it by pluralizing the void into a mosaic of fulfillable essences, while critiquing its potential nihilism. Ultimately, their relation illuminates paths to ethical living in a world of uncertainty, where freedom meets multiplicity for authentic realization.Metaphysical Relations: The Absurd Void Versus Irreducible Plural EssencesExistentialism's metaphysics is characterized by a profound sense of absurdity and the rejection of inherent meaning or essence. For Kierkegaard, existence is a leap of faith amid paradox; Nietzsche proclaims the "death of God," leaving humans to create values in a chaotic, eternal recurrence; Heidegger views Being (Dasein) as thrown into an inauthentic world, confronting nothingness (Nichts) through anxiety; Sartre asserts radical freedom in a godless universe where humans are "condemned to be free," with no pre-given essence; Camus embraces the absurd as the confrontation between human desire for meaning and the world's silence. Multiplicity exists—diverse individuals, choices, and perspectives—but without unity or purpose, leading to alienation and the need for authentic self-creation.Ethical Pluralism converges with existentialism in rejecting unified teleology or essentialism: Both affirm impermanence and contingency—existentialism's absurd flux parallels Pluralism's finitude-transformation interplay, where endings (death) enable renewal without predetermined meaning. Quantum indeterminacy's lack of causality echoes existential freedom—superpositions as choices without resolution. Both critique dogmatism: Existentialism rejects religious absolutes; Pluralism any common essence.Yet divergences are stark: Existentialism's multiplicity is absurd, a void without inherent structure; Pluralism's is ontological truth—essences as real, independent modes, not empty chaos. Existentialism dissolves unity for individual freedom; Pluralism affirms absolute separation, critiquing absurdity as overlooking essences' intrinsic value (e.g., aspiration providing strivings beyond nihilism). Heidegger's Being as thrown parallels Pluralism's contingent interactions, but Pluralism fills the "nothingness" with affirmable essences.This metaphysical relation positions Pluralism as existentialism's pluralistic optimism: Both confront uncertainty, but where existentialism leaves a void for self-creation, Pluralism mosaics it with essences for affirmation.Epistemological Relations: Subjective Authenticity Versus Experiential DiscernmentExistentialism's epistemology is radically subjective: Knowledge is personal, derived from lived experience (erlebnis)—Kierkegaard's truth as subjectivity, Heidegger's authentic disclosure through care (Sorge), Sartre's bad faith (mauvaise foi) vs. authenticity. Reason is limited, often deceptive (e.g., Nietzsche's critique of rationalism as life-denying); insight arises from confronting existence's absurdity, rejecting objective universals for individual choice.Ethical Pluralism similarly limits reason to "visible essences" (phenomena)—inept for "invisible" (super) realms, where overreach imposes false unity. Knowledge derives from God-Cognisance: Experiential apprehension of plurality, with intuition enabling transcendent discernment beyond concepts.Convergences: Both emphasize experiential insight—existentialism's authenticity parallels intuition's transcendent grasp; critique of reason (limited to inauthentic vs. visible). Subjective truth aligns: Existential choice as discerning existence; Pluralism's discernment as authentic navigation. Divergences: Existentialism's knowledge is individualistic synthesis amid absurdity; Pluralism affirms multiplicity, integrating science (quantum intuition) where existentialism's pre-modern subjectivity focuses anguish.Pluralism complements existentialism epistemologically: Both seek authentic knowledge, but Pluralism grounds it in plurality, pluralizing choice into discernment.Ethical Relations: Self-Created Values Versus Intrinsic AffirmationExistentialist ethics derive from freedom: In absurdity, humans create meaning—Kierkegaard's leap to faith, Nietzsche's Übermensch affirming life, Heidegger's authentic resoluteness, Sartre's responsibility in choice, Camus' revolt through solidarity. Morality is subjective, rejecting universals for authentic existence amid alienation.Ethical Pluralism derives ethics from essence-affirmation: Intrinsic goodness affirms plurality without purpose—discernment evaluates for harmony. Like existentialism, affirmation is choice-based; ethics as authentic participation.Convergences: Both pragmatic/authentic—existential creation parallels affirming aspiration; rejection of dogmatism (theistic absolutes vs. unity). Solidarity echoes relational fulfillment. Divergences: Existentialism's ethics create in void; Pluralism affirm independent essences—critiquing absurdity as overlooking intrinsic value (e.g., aspiration providing strivings without nihilism). Existentialism's anguish-driven morality contrasts Pluralism's awe-inspired affirmation.Pluralism critiques existential ethics: Freedom risks immoral arbitrariness (e.g., bad faith as distortion); affirming plurality enables discerning values without void.Modern and Scientific Context: Pluralism's Complement to Existential FreedomExistentialism adapts to modernity (e.g., Camus' absurd in post-war alienation) but faces scientific challenges—subjectivity aligns with phenomenology, but absurdity clashes with quantum/evolutionary meaning. Ethical Pluralism complements by pluralizing existentialism: Quantum essences (multiple choices) echo freedom but affirm real value; evolution's contingency as absurd but derives ethics from it.Relationally, Pluralism updates existentialism—affirmation as discerning choice amid plurality—while existentialism deepens with authentic resoluteness. Yet, Pluralism critiques existentialism's nihilism: Affirming multiplicity integrates science's potentials.Conclusion: An Existential Pluralism for Authentic MultiplicityEthical Pluralism and existentialism relate as freedom-focused allies: Both reject essentials for lived meaning, but where existentialism creates in absurdity, Pluralism affirms in multiplicity. This relation fosters synergy—Pluralism grounding existentialism scientifically, existentialism deepening Pluralism's freedom. In an uncertain world, their fusion might yield "existential pluralism": Affirming essences through authentic choice, guiding ethics toward discerning fulfillment amid diversity.