Ethical Pluralism (a new Mathilde Ludendorff) and Abrahamic Monotheism

  Table of Contents

Abrahamic Monotheism and Ethical Pluralism: A Comparative Analysis of Unity, Multiplicity, and Moral FrameworksIntroduction: The Clash and Convergence of Oneness and PluralityAbrahamic monotheism, encompassing Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and related traditions like Noahidism, represents one of the most influential philosophical and religious paradigms in human history. Rooted in the belief in a single, transcendent God who created and governs the universe, these traditions emphasize divine unity (tawhid in Islam, echad in Judaism), moral commandments derived from revelation, and a teleological view of existence where human life is oriented toward obedience, salvation, and ethical conduct in alignment with God's will. Scriptures like the Torah, Bible, Quran, and Talmud serve as foundational texts, shaping ethics through laws, prophecies, and narratives that stress justice, mercy, and covenantal relationships.Ethical Pluralism, a contemporary philosophical reconstruction, stands in stark contrast yet intriguing dialogue with this monotheistic framework. It posits reality as a mosaic of irreducible plural essences—independent modes of being such as persistence (replicative continuity), finitude (programmed termination), transformation (contingent change), consciousness (reflective awareness), aspiration (strivings toward ethical, aesthetic, epistemic, and relational values), transcendence (elevation beyond constraints), moral discernment (intrinsic evaluation), and relational fulfillment (discerning bonds)—coexisting without any common aspect, unifying principle, or hierarchical teleology. Inspired by quantum mechanics' probabilistic multiplicities and evolutionary biology's contingent diversities, Ethical Pluralism derives ethics not from divine commands or unified purpose but from the intrinsic affirmation of these essences via "God-Cognisance," an experiential awareness that fosters fulfillment amid diversity, free from dogma, reward, or punishment.This essay compares Abrahamic monotheism to Ethical Pluralism, structured by sections on Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and Noahidism. Each section explores metaphysical alignments and tensions (unity vs. multiplicity), epistemological approaches (revelation vs. experiential insight), ethical derivations (command-based vs. essence-affirming), and implications for human life. Through this, we uncover how Pluralism critiques monotheism's unifying absolutism while potentially complementing its ethical rigor, offering a pluralistic alternative in a fragmented world.Judaism and Ethical Pluralism: Covenant, Law, and the Multiplicity of Divine ExpressionsJudaism, the foundational Abrahamic faith emerging around the 2nd millennium BCE, centers on monotheism as articulated in the Shema: "Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one" (Deuteronomy 6:4). God (YHWH) is singular, transcendent, and immanent, creator of all, entering covenants with humanity (e.g., with Abraham, Moses at Sinai). Reality is unified under God's sovereignty, with multiplicity (e.g., diverse nations, laws) as expressions of divine will. The Torah's 613 mitzvot (commandments) derive ethics from revelation—halakha (law) guides life toward tikkun olam (repairing the world), emphasizing justice (tzedek), mercy (chesed), and holiness (kedusha). Kabbalah introduces mystical plurality (e.g., sefirot as divine emanations), but subordinated to Ein Sof (infinite unity).Ethical Pluralism converges with Judaism in affirming multiplicity's role: Essences like transformation and relational fulfillment echo sefirot's dynamic attributes (e.g., chesed as relational goodness), and moral discernment parallels midrashic interpretation of law. Both reject absolutism—Jain-like anekantavada in Pluralism mirrors Talmudic debate's multiple truths, and transcendence's timeless states align with Shabbat's rest as divine elevation. Evolution's contingency complements Judaism's creation as ongoing process (e.g., God's rest on seventh day affirming finitude).Divergences are sharp: Judaism's monotheism unifies multiplicity under YHWH; Pluralism rejects any common aspect, critiquing covenantal unity as imposing hierarchy on independent essences (e.g., mitzvot as commands distort intrinsic affirmation). Revelation derives ethics top-down; Pluralism experientially, bottom-up—God-Cognisance as awareness vs. Torah as divine word. Kabbalah's emanations suggest plurality, but Pluralism affirms absolute independence, viewing Ein Sof as false synthesis.Ethically, Judaism's halakha derives duty from unity (obey God); Pluralism from affirmation (intrinsically align essences)—tikkun olam as repairing mirrors affirming transformation, but without teleology. Pluralism critiques Judaism's particularism (chosen people) as relational distortion; Judaism enriches Pluralism's discernment with communal law. In modern contexts, Pluralism offers Judaism a scientific pluralism (quantum essences echoing sefirot), while Judaism grounds Pluralism's ethics in covenantal responsibility.Christianity and Ethical Pluralism: Trinity, Salvation, and Pluralistic TranscendenceChristianity, evolving from Judaism in the 1st century CE, affirms monotheism through the Trinity—one God in three persons (Father, Son, Holy Spirit)—a unity-in-diversity where multiplicity (persons) subsists in singular essence. Reality is created by God, fallen through sin, redeemed via Christ's incarnation, death, and resurrection. Ethics derive from agape (unconditional love), the Sermon on the Mount (e.g., turn the other cheek), and grace—salvation by faith, works as fruit. Mysticism (e.g., apophatic theology) emphasizes transcendence beyond reason, with plurality (e.g., diverse gifts in the body of Christ) as divine expression.Ethical Pluralism converges with Christianity in transcendent fulfillment: Essences like relational fulfillment echo agape's bonds, and transcendence's timeless states parallel mystical union (theosis). Moral discernment affirms intrinsic goodness, akin to fruits of the Spirit (love, joy, peace). Trinity's unity-in-diversity mirrors essences' coexistence, and evolution's finitude (death as renewal) aligns with resurrection as transformative hope. Quantum entanglement's links without fusion complements Trinitarian perichoresis (mutual indwelling).Divergences: Christianity's monotheism unifies multiplicity in God; Pluralism rejects common aspects, critiquing Trinity as imposed harmony on independent essences (e.g., persons as relational without fusion). Salvation derives ethics soteriologically (grace beyond works); Pluralism intrinsically, experientially—no sin/redemption, but affirmation amid imperfection. Original sin's unity (fallen humanity) contrasts Pluralism's contingent multiplicity.Ethically, Christianity's commandments (e.g., love neighbor) derive from divine unity; Pluralism from essence-affirmation—agape as relational, but without purpose (salvation). Pluralism critiques Christianity's exclusivity (one way to God) as discernment distortion; Christianity enriches Pluralism's transcendence with incarnational ethics. In modernity, Pluralism offers Christianity quantum pluralism (Trinity as essences), while Christianity grounds Pluralism's discernment in communal love.Islam and Ethical Pluralism: Tawhid, Sharia, and Discerning MultiplicityIslam, revealed to Prophet Muhammad in the 7th century CE, affirms absolute monotheism (tawhid)—Allah as one, indivisible, transcendent creator. Reality is unified under God's will, with multiplicity (e.g., diverse creation) as signs (ayat) of divine oneness. The Quran and Hadith derive ethics from submission (islam)—sharia (law) guides via pillars (e.g., salat, zakat) and principles like justice (adl), compassion (rahma), and stewardship (khalifa). Sufism introduces mystical plurality (e.g., fana, annihilation in God), but subordinated to tawhid.Ethical Pluralism converges with Islam in affirming multiplicity's signs: Essences like transformation echo ayat's divine indicators, and moral discernment parallels ijtihad (reasoned effort in law). Relational fulfillment aligns with ummah (community bonds), and transcendence's states resemble dhikr (remembrance of God). Evolutionary contingency complements qadar (divine decree as natural law), and quantum non-locality echoes tawhid's unity but affirms independence.Divergences: Islam's tawhid unifies multiplicity in Allah; Pluralism rejects common aspects, critiquing as imposition (e.g., creation as essences without creator-unity). Revelation derives ethics (Quranic commands); Pluralism experientially—no sharia, but intrinsic affirmation. Sufi fana's dissolution contrasts Pluralism's affirmation of plurality.Ethically, Islam's sharia derives from unity (obey Allah); Pluralism from essences—zakat as relational, but without purpose (reward in afterlife). Pluralism critiques Islam's absolutism (one truth) as epistemic distortion; Islam enriches Pluralism's discernment with disciplined law. In modernity, Pluralism offers Islam quantum pluralism (tawhid as harmony amid essences), while Islam grounds Pluralism's ethics in communal justice.Noahidism and Ethical Pluralism: Universal Laws and Pluralistic AffirmationNoahidism, a Jewish tradition for Gentiles based on seven laws from Genesis (e.g., no idolatry, murder, theft; establish courts), represents Abrahamic universalism—monotheism's ethical minimum for all humanity, emphasizing justice and monotheistic worship without full Torah observance. It views multiplicity (nations) as divine plan under one God, with ethics derived from covenantal reason.Ethical Pluralism converges with Noahidism in universal ethics: Seven laws echo duties affirming essences (e.g., no murder protects finitude-persistence). Moral discernment parallels establishing courts (evaluation), and relational fulfillment aligns with no adultery/theft (discerning bonds). Evolutionary ethics complement Noahide natural law.Divergences: Noahidism's monotheism unifies under God; Pluralism rejects, critiquing covenant as hierarchy. Laws derive from revelation; Pluralism intrinsically—no idolatry as essence-distortion, but affirmation.Ethically, Noahidism's minimum derives from unity; Pluralism from plurality—courts as discernment, but without worship. Pluralism critiques Noahidism's theism as purpose-imposition; Noahidism enriches Pluralism's universalism with minimal laws. In modernity, Pluralism offers Noahidism scientific pluralism, while Noahidism grounds discernment in ethical basics.Conclusion: Pluralism's Dialogue with Abrahamic UnityAbrahamic monotheism and Ethical Pluralism relate as contrasting paradigms: Monotheism unifies multiplicity under one God for ethical obedience; Pluralism affirms absolute multiplicity for intrinsic fulfillment. This tension fosters potential synergy—Pluralism purifying monotheism's dogmas with science, Abrahamic traditions deepening Pluralism's ethics with covenantal depth. In a diverse world, their integration might yield "plural monotheism": Affirming multiplicity's unity in experiential discernment, guiding ethics toward sacred harmony amid difference.